Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1986-7-28
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The desirability of obtaining written informed consent for low-risk radiologic procedures has been the subject of controversy. A group of 80 patients was studied to evaluate the effect of informed consent for excretory urograms on: (1) incidence of contrast reactions; (2) discomfort during the procedure; (3) level of patients' anxiety before and after the procedure; (4) patients' perception of the procedure; and (5) desirability of informed consent from the patients' viewpoint. Results revealed no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in the incidence of reactions, discomfort, perception of the examination, or anxiety level prior to the procedure. The informed consent group had a statistically greater factual knowledge of the procedure evaluated objectively (P less than 0.01). Of the patients who received the written consent form, 83% regarded it as helpful and none viewed it as harmful or refused the examination. In the control group, 32% desired more information.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0171-1091
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
8
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
35-9
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:3727205-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:3727205-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:3727205-Anxiety,
pubmed-meshheading:3727205-Attitude,
pubmed-meshheading:3727205-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:3727205-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:3727205-Informed Consent,
pubmed-meshheading:3727205-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:3727205-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:3727205-Prospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:3727205-Urography
|
pubmed:year |
1986
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Response of patients to informed consent for excretory urography.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|