|
pubmed:abstractText |
Forty-three malignant pleural mesotheliomas and 10 known metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinomas to the pleura were studied by immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies 44-3A6 and 624A12. Monoclonal antibodies 44-3A6 and 624A12 were raised against human pulmonary carcinoma cell lines; they recognize a membrane-associated protein of 40,000 mol wt and a specific sugar sequence of lacto-N-fucopentose III, respectively. Samples were also studied with a broad-spectrum antikeratin antibody and a polyclonal antibody to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). These investigations were performed on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues. The mesotheliomas comprised only grossly evident, pleurectomized, or pneumonectomized cases; they included 22 epithelial, 15 biphasic, and 6 spindle cell types. Electron-microscopic study was also done on 9 cases. None of the mesotheliomas was immunoreactive to 624A12, while 9/10 metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinomas were convincingly immunoreactive. Monoclonal antibody 44-3A6 immunostained all of the metastatic adenocarcinomas strongly, whereas only 10/43 mesotheliomas were focally and weakly immunoreactive. The latter included 5 epithelial and 4 biophasic mesotheliomas and 1 spindle cell mesotheliomas; the immunoreaction was confined to scattered single cells, and the staining pattern was readily discernible from that of adenocarcinomas. Forty of 43 mesotheliomas were strongly immunoreactive with the broad-spectrum anti-keratin antibody, whereas 8/10 metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinomas showed focal and rather weak staining. Seven of 10 metastatic adenocarcinomas were immunoreactive to anti-CEA antibody, while only 15/43 mesotheliomas displayed weak immunoreactivity. It is concluded that monoclonal antibodies 44-3A6 and 624A12 are excellent phenotypic markers of metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinomas to the pleura and thus are useful for the differential diagnosis of pleural mesotheliomas. Given conventionally fixed and processed tissues, it appears that the combined use of these monoclonal antibodies may be more effective for that differential diagnosis than anti-CEA and anti-keratin antibodies.
|
