Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1986-7-14
pubmed:abstractText
Although several phenothiazines are known to stimulate prolactin (PRL) secretion, only chlorpromazine is in general use for this purpose in humans. However, chlorpromazine has severe sedative and hypotensive effects. Therefore, the effects of perphenazine on human PRL release and on blood pressure were evaluated. Perphenazine was administered orally (8mg) and intramuscularly (5mg and 2mg) to determine the optimal route and dose for evaluating PRL release. The postural hypotensive effect of perphenazine was evaluated with the 2mg intramuscular (IM) dose. The mean time of peak PRL response (hr +/- SD) was significantly shorter (p less than 0.05) for the 5mg IM (1.7 +/- 0.4) than the oral (4.5 +/- 0.6) route. Also, the mean ratio of peak/baseline PRL was significantly greater for the 5mg IM (8.87 +/- 5.69) than the oral (5.12 +/- 2.90) route. The major side-effect produced by perphenazine was drowsiness, which was moderate to severe with the 5mg IM dose. A lower IM dose (2 mg) retained PRL releasing activity, reduced drowsiness, and did not produce hypotension. For clinical testing, intramuscular perphenazine is preferred over oral perphenazine because of the shorter latency period and the higher PRL levels. Intramuscular perphenazine (2 mg) is preferred to chlorpromazine since it did not produce a clinically significant hypotensive effect. This is the first report on the dynamic responses of PRL and blood pressure to intramuscular perphenazine in humans.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0002-9629
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
291
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
380-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-14
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1986
pubmed:articleTitle
Prolactin and blood pressure responses to perphenazine in human subjects: comparison of the oral and intramuscular routes.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.