Linked Life Data

3669696

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/3669696

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1987-12-14
pubmed:abstractText
Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, chest roentgenography, and mediastinoscopy were compared prospectively as staging modalities to assess mediastinal node status in 84 patients with presumed operable bronchogenic carcinoma. Computed tomography was associated with a sensitivity of 71.0%, a specificity of 87.7% and an overall accuracy of 82.1%. Magnetic resonance imaging did not provide any advantage over computed tomography in the assessment of mediastinal node status. The accuracy of computed tomography was not dependent on cell type of the primary tumor. Although chest roentgenography had a sensitivity of 80.7%, the overall accuracy of 57.1% was unacceptably low. The sensitivity (87.1%), specificity (100%), positive (100%) and negative (93.0%) predictive values, and accuracy (95.2%) of mediastinoscopy exceeded those observed with all other modalities. We continue to recommend mediastinoscopy as the most accurate staging investigation in the routine management of patients with bronchogenic carcinoma.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0022-5223
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
94
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
679-84
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1987
pubmed:articleTitle
A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and mediastinoscopy in the preoperative assessment of mediastinal node status in bronchogenic carcinoma.
pubmed:affiliation
Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study