Linked Life Data

3595215

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/3595215

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1987-7-27
pubmed:abstractText
An epidemiologic analysis is presented of 4,102 women to a birth cohort in Frederiksborg County. The purpose is to evaluate the predictive value of pregnancy risk groups (R) present before labour for complicated delivery (CD) and neonatal morbidity (NM). The risk factors defining R comply with the Danish National Board of Health Recommendations. R included 56%. By primary risk group (PR) is understood women only with complicating factors at the onset of pregnancy, by secondary risk group (SR) women only with complicating factors occurring during pregnancy. The tertiary risk group (TR), which includes women with a complication which with certainty implies CD, was excluded. PR and SR were significant regression variables evaluated by CD and NM. Primiparae had a higher frequency of CD than multiparae, both in the no-risk group (N-R) and in the R, but not evaluated by NM. Primiparity, thus, was a risk factor for CD. NM correlated with CD in the form of severe risk conditions for both the mother and child during delivery. Evaluated by CD and NM, the predictive value of belonging to R was 46% and 16%, and the predictive value of belonging to N-R was 69% and 93%, which suggests that a re-evaluation of the risk factors is required.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0907-8916
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
34
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
173-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-11
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1987
pubmed:articleTitle
The unborn and the newborn child. Present obstetric risk grouping fails to predict complicated labour and neonatal morbidity.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't