Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1987-6-26
pubmed:abstractText
Various investigations were conducted on 84 patients undergoing a second look operation (S.L.O.) intended to detect any recurrent tumors and determine the timing of the cessation of therapy. The following conclusions were obtained: Tumors were found in 18 patients (21.4%) whose preoperative diagnosis was neither subjectively nor objectively abnormal. Patients who received S.L.O. had a considerably better 5 year survival rate than the control group. S.L.O. can safely be omitted only in patients with Stage I border line ovarian tumors. S.L.O. is essential in cases where basic surgical procedures were not carried out during the initial operation. No occlusion could be reached as to the best time to perform S.L.O. In almost all of the patients who died, the site of recurrence was somewhere outside the abdominal cavity, but no recurrent tumors had been found during S.L.O. S.L.O. is still a more efficient follow-up method than CA125, TPA or IAP tumor markers, although the preoperative results of these tests reflected the laparotomy findings relatively well.
pubmed:language
jpn
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0300-9165
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
39
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
567-72
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-7-29
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1987
pubmed:articleTitle
[Second look operations in ovarian cancer--a clinical study on the detection of recurrent tumors and the judgment on termination of treatment in 84 cases].
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, English Abstract, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't