Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1987-5-11
pubmed:abstractText
Even the highest contrast sensitivities that humans can achieve for the detection of targets on uniform fields fall far short of ideal values. Recent theoretical formulations have attributed departures from ideal performance to two factors--the existence of internal noise within the observer and suboptimal stimulus information sampling by the observer. It has been postulated that the contributions of these two factors can be evaluated separately by measuring contrast-detection thresholds as a function of the level of externally added visual noise. We wished to determine whether a similar analysis could be applied to contrast discrimination and whether variation of the increment threshold with pedestal contrast is due to changes in internal noise or sampling efficiency. We measured contrast-increment thresholds as a function of noise spectral density for near-threshold and suprathreshold pedestal contrasts. The experiments were conducted separately for static and dynamic noise. Our findings indicate that the same formulation can be applied to contrast discrimination and that changes in the estimated values of internal noise, rather than changes in sampling efficiency, play the major role in determining properties of contrast discrimination. Implications for models of contrast coding in vision are discussed.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0740-3232
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
4
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
391-404
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-21
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1987
pubmed:articleTitle
Contrast discrimination in noise.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't