Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
1
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1987-5-7
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
The evaluation of two- and four-subtest short forms of the WAIS-R has proceeded with little empirical attention to the effects of shortened administration time upon test performance. Routinely, the full WAIS-R has been administered and short form estimates extracted from the complete set of test results. Time and motivational/attentional factors can be evaluated by the administration of short form subtests first, followed by the remaining subtests in standard order or, alternatively, by the test-retest paradigm with short and complete WAIS-R versions. Limitations of these methodologies and existing empirical results are discussed.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Jan
|
| pubmed:issn |
0021-9762
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
43
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
142-4
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1987
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Methodological issues in the clinical evaluation of two- and four-subtest short forms of the WAIS-R.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|