Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1987-4-6
pubmed:abstractText
A study was conducted to compare the recovery of clinical isolates by the DuPont Isolator and Roche Septi-Chek blood culture systems. A total of 5,262 blood culture specimens were processed by the two systems. Of these, 358 cultures contained significant isolates: 219 were positive in both systems, 68 were recovered only by Isolator, 71 were recovered by Septi-Chek only (not statistically significant). Of the isolates recovered in both systems, 159 were positive the same day, 55 were recovered first by Isolator, and 5 were recovered first by Septi-Chek. In cases where Isolator recovered organisms first, the average difference in time was one to two days. Regarding particular groups of organisms, there was no difference between the systems in recovery of Enterobacteriaceae, anaerobes, yeast, and gram-positive bacteria, except for Streptococcus pneumoniae. Septi-Chek recovered S. pneumoniae significantly more often. These results suggest that these two systems are essentially comparable, except with S. pneumoniae, although the Isolator frequently provided results more rapidly.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0002-9173
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
87
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
396-8
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1987
pubmed:articleTitle
Clinical comparison of the Roche Septi-Chek and Dupont Isolator blood culture systems.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't