Linked Life Data

3511957

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/3511957

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1986-4-3
pubmed:abstractText
Antenatal fetal heart rate monitoring was compared with the study of umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms for the recognition of fetal compromise in 170 patients considered at high fetal risk. In 53 patients the infant had a 5-min Apgar score of less than 7 and/or a birthweight less than 10th centile of weight for gestation. Fetal heart rate traces were classified as reactive or non-reactive and also assessed with a modified Fischer score. The systolic/diastolic A/B ratio was measured in the umbilical artery waveform. Fetal compromise was more efficiently recognized by study of the umbilical artery waveforms. The sensitivity of assessment by umbilical artery waveforms was 60% compared with 17% and 36% respectively, for the two methods of scoring fetal heart rate traces. This was not associated with an increase in false-positive results as the predictive value of both positive (64% compared with 69 and 58%) and negative (83% compared with 72 and 75%) results was similar when umbilical artery waveform analysis was compared with the two methods of scoring fetal heart rate traces. Specificity was also similar (85% compared with 97 and 88%).
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0306-5456
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
93
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
171-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1986
pubmed:articleTitle
A comparison of fetal heart rate monitoring and umbilical artery waveforms in the recognition of fetal compromise.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't