Linked Life Data

3415794

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/3415794

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3 Pt 3
pubmed:dateCreated
1988-10-19
pubmed:abstractText
The validity of the Dinamap automated oscillometric blood pressure monitor, an instrument frequently used for continuous monitoring in intensive care settings, was evaluated in comparison to two standard methods of blood pressure measurement. Oscillometric monitoring was compared to random-zero sphygmomanometry in 28 ambulatory subjects, using the instruments in a random order. The oscillometric monitor overestimated random-zero systolic pressure (mean difference = 5.7 mm Hg; P less than 0.001), but did not differ in diastolic pressure (difference = 1.3 mm Hg, P greater than 0.3). Correlation (r) between methods was 0.94 for systolic pressure and 0.83 for diastolic pressure. Repeatability of sequential measures did not differ between methods. To evaluate the oscillometric monitor in the intraoperative setting, it was used simultaneously with a radial artery catheter to measure blood pressure in 14 patients undergoing peripheral vascular or other major surgery. The oscillometric monitor underestimated intra-arterial systolic pressure (mean difference = -9.4 mm Hg; P less than 0.002), but overestimated intraarterial diastolic pressure (difference = 5.7 mm Hg; P less than 0.005). There was no difference in mean arterial pressure (P greater than 0.1). Correlation between methods was 0.88 for systolic, 0.71 for diastolic, and 0.79 for mean arterial pressure. The oscillometric instrument had a sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 97% in detecting intraarterial systolic pressures of 160 mm Hg or greater, and a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 89% in detecting intraarterial systolic pressures of 100 mm Hg or less. These findings demonstrate differences between the oscillometric monitor and other standard methods of blood pressure measurement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
0895-7061
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
1
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
161S-167S
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-2-24
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1988
pubmed:articleTitle
Evaluation of the Dinamap continuous blood pressure monitor.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Randomized Controlled Trial