Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1988-8-10
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Isolated hepatocytes of rat, rabbit and guinea pig were found to take up and degrade 125I-labelled asialoorosomucoid at different rates with the rank order: rabbit greater than rat greater than guinea pig. Measurement of 125I-asialoorosomucoid binding at 4 degrees C to these hepatocytes revealed that all these cells had two classes of receptors with a major difference occurring in the number of high-affinity binding sites. The average binding affinity constants (K) and receptor concentration (N) calculated from a least-square analysis of the Scatchard plots were K1 = 1.15.10(9) M-1, K2 = 0.93.10(7) M-1, N1 = 0.049 pmol/mg cell protein and N2 = 0.27 pmol/mg cell protein for the rat; K2 = 3.16.10(7) M-1, N1 = 0.027 pmol/mg cell protein and N2 = 0.13 pmol/mg cell protein for the guinea pig and K1 = 0.74.10(9) M-1, K2 = 3.85.10(7) M-1, N1 = 0.205 pmol/mg cell protein and N2 = 0.37 pmol/mg cell protein for the rabbit hepatocytes, respectively. Measurement of the total number of cellular receptors after solubilization with Triton X-100 also revealed the same receptor concentration rank order of rabbit (5.8 pmol/mg cell protein) greater than rat (0.55 pmol/mg cell protein) greater than guinea pig (0.18 pmol/mg cell protein). Intravenous injection of 125I-asialoorosomucoid into anesthetized animals of matched body weight also indicated that the rate of plasma clearance and the rate of appearance of the degraded product of the tracer were different among these species with the same rank order as that observed with isolated hepatocytes. Thus there is a fundamental difference in the number of asialoglycoprotein receptors both on the cell surface and inside hepatocytes of these mammalian species.
|
pubmed:grant | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jul
|
pubmed:issn |
0006-3002
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
7
|
pubmed:volume |
942
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
57-64
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-14
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:3382658-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:3382658-Asialoglycoprotein Receptor,
pubmed-meshheading:3382658-Asialoglycoproteins,
pubmed-meshheading:3382658-Biological Transport,
pubmed-meshheading:3382658-Guinea Pigs,
pubmed-meshheading:3382658-Liver,
pubmed-meshheading:3382658-Metabolic Clearance Rate,
pubmed-meshheading:3382658-Rabbits,
pubmed-meshheading:3382658-Rats,
pubmed-meshheading:3382658-Receptors, Immunologic
|
pubmed:year |
1988
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Hepatic uptake of asialoglycoprotein is different among mammalian species due to different receptor distribution.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Isaac Gordon Center of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Genesee Hospital, Rochester, NY 14607.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
|