Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1977-12-29
pubmed:abstractText
Two years of experience with our replantation service in Vienna serves to define the criteria by which an amputated member is deemed worthy of replantation. 68 cases are analyzed and the complications and failures are discussed. The criteria took into account the type of injury, the ischemia time, the method adopted to preserve the severed part as well as the functional need of the amputee. We believe that by today's standard of replantation surgery, with the aid of microsurgical methods a responsible approach to indications would improve the functional results. Replantation capability, replantation possibility, replantation readiness and replantation obsession are all discussed.
pubmed:language
ger
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0046-6794
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
9
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
59-62
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1977
pubmed:articleTitle
[Complications and failures through negative selection in replantation of amputated extremities].
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, English Abstract