Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
11
pubmed:dateCreated
1988-5-6
pubmed:abstractText
In a double-blind between-patient clinical trial, 82 patients were admitted to the study and after a preliminary period with placebo administered in single-blindness, they were divided into two groups: "placebo-responders" and "placebo non-responders". Responders were treated with pirprofen capsules (400 mg, b.i.d.) or placebo capsules b.i.d.; non-responders were treated with pirprofen capsules (400 mg, b.i.d.) or naproxen capsules (250 mg, b.i.d.) according to two different randomisation lists, for four menstrual cycles. A complete medical examination, including evaluation of associated symptomatology, menstrual flow entity and global efficacy, was performed after each cycle. In the responders group results were significantly better with pirprofen than with placebo after only the second cycle of treatment (p less than 0.01). In the non-responders group both treatments showed "good" or "excellent" results in more than 80% of patients in all cycles. In all patients there were no significant differences in the evaluation of the menstrual flow entity, of the associated symptomatology and of the number of side-effects.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0378-6501
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
13
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
699-705
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1987
pubmed:articleTitle
Pirprofen, naproxen and placebo in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea.
pubmed:affiliation
Mangiagalli Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Milan, Italy.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial