Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
12
pubmed:dateCreated
1988-4-19
pubmed:abstractText
The histological distinction between endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinoma may present diagnostic difficulties. Several reports have suggested that differences in the histochemical staining of the tumours may indicate their histogenesis. In this paper we have compared the staining properties of 20 endocervical adenocarcinomas (14 invasive and six in situ) with 12 cases of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Unequivocal examples were used where the site of origin was not in doubt. Sections were stained using a monoclonal antibody to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alcian blue at pH 1.0 and pH 2.5, PAS-diastase and toluidine blue. The results were graded by two pathologists and results compared. Three poorly differentiated invasive endocervical tumours were completely negative for CEA. Seventeen out of the remaining 20 endocervical tumours and 7/12 endometrial adenocarcinomas showed a non-specific apical staining pattern. This also occurred in normal and dysplastic endocervical glands. Intense intracytoplasmic staining for CEA was found in 7/14 invasive and 3/6 in situ endocervical adenocarcinomas. Normal endocervix never showed this staining reaction. However, 4/12 endometrial tumours showed a similar pattern. Mucin stains showed no specific staining pattern for either tumour. In an individual case where the site of origin is in doubt, histochemical methods are of little value in confidently resolving the problem.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0309-0167
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
11
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1321-30
pubmed:dateRevised
2005-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1987
pubmed:articleTitle
Adenocarcinoma of the endocervix--a histochemical study.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article