Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
4
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1988-5-4
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
We evaluated the test-retest interrater reliability of the Family History Research Diagnostic Criteria (FH-RDC) in 58 depressed patients who described 341 first-degree relatives. Reliability was examined as a function of the threshold to determine caseness. In general, diagnostic reliability was good-excellent for specific FH-RDC disorders, but not for the residual category of other psychiatric disorder. A higher diagnostic threshold was associated with greater reliability, especially for the diagnosis of depression. Patient variance accounted for a greater percentage of the disagreements between the interviewers than did rater variance.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Apr
|
| pubmed:issn |
0003-990X
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
45
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
320-2
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
| pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:3281625-Data Collection,
pubmed-meshheading:3281625-Depressive Disorder,
pubmed-meshheading:3281625-Family,
pubmed-meshheading:3281625-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:3281625-Mental Disorders,
pubmed-meshheading:3281625-Predictive Value of Tests,
pubmed-meshheading:3281625-Psychiatric Status Rating Scales,
pubmed-meshheading:3281625-Psychometrics,
pubmed-meshheading:3281625-Research Design,
pubmed-meshheading:3281625-Sensitivity and Specificity
|
| pubmed:year |
1988
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
The reliability of the family history method for psychiatric diagnoses.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|