Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
10
pubmed:dateCreated
1989-1-26
pubmed:abstractText
A cross sectional survey was carried out on 138 workers exposed to laboratory animals. Sixty (44%) had symptoms in a self completed questionnaire that were consistent with laboratory animal allergy (LAA) of whom 15 (11%) had chest symptoms. There was a positive skin prick test to one or more animal urine extracts (rat, mouse, guinea pig, rabbit) in 13% and 38% had a positive radioallergosorbent test to urine extract. LAA chest symptoms were almost five times more common in atopic than non-atopic subjects (who were distinguished by skin test response to common, non-animal aeroallergens). A positive skin test to animal urine was associated with LAA chest symptoms and with atopy. Nose, eye, or skin symptoms without chest symptoms were not associated with atopy. There was an inverse relation between duration of employment at the firm and LAA chest symptoms, suggesting selection of affected people out of employment with animals.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-2990525, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-3161203, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-3264182, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-3711552, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-3814545, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-3814547, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-3917750, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-3947583, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-4006174, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-6111683, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-6350369, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-6626473, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-6627621, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-6678348, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-6772703, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-6832845, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-7058838, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-7216507, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-72196, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-7288048, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/3264181-7470403
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0007-1072
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
45
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
660-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1988
pubmed:articleTitle
Laboratory animal allergy in a pharmaceutical company.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Occupational Medicine, Cardiothoracic Institute, London, UK.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article