| pubmed-article:3219525 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0008976 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0034656 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0085279 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205173 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205368 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0524724 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0023981 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1553454 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1301906 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205175 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:issue | 10 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1989-3-23 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:abstractText | Thirty-three consecutive patients having restorative proctocolectomy since April 1986 were randomly allocated to reconstruction using a stapled J pouch (n = 18) or a sutured W pouch (n = 15). There were no deaths, but one patient required pouch excision for ischaemia (J). One patient developed a leak from the pouch necessitating loop ileostomy (J) and one patient had a low pouch vaginal fistula successfully treated by a seton (W). There were no other major complications. Median (range) operative time was 200 min (165-290) for J pouch and 255 min (220-330) for the W pouch (P less than 0.05). In 24 patients followed up for more than 4 months after restoring intestinal continuity, median frequency of defaecation over 24 h was 4 (3-6) for the J pouch and 4 (3-6) for the W pouch. There was no incontinence, urgency or soiling. These results indicate that the quicker J pouch provides identical functional results to the larger W pouch in this series of patients. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:citationSubset | AIM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:month | Oct | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:issn | 0007-1323 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KeighleyM RMR | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:YoshiokaKK | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KmiotWW | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:volume | 75 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:pagination | 1008-11 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2004-11-17 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:3219525-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:3219525-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:3219525-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:3219525-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:3219525-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:3219525-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:3219525-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:3219525-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:3219525-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:3219525-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:3219525-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:3219525-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:3219525-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:3219525-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:3219525-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:3219525-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:year | 1988 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:articleTitle | Prospective randomized trial to compare the stapled double lumen pouch and the sutured quadruple pouch for restorative proctocolectomy. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Surgery, General Hospital, Birmingham, UK. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:publicationType | Clinical Trial | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:3219525 | pubmed:publicationType | Randomized Controlled Trial | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:3219525 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:3219525 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:3219525 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:3219525 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:3219525 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:3219525 | lld:pubmed |
