Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1988-12-20
pubmed:abstractText
In an attempt to determine the safety of appendectomy performed as an incidental procedure, the authors reviewed 853 operations (458 hysterectomies and 395 cholecystectomies) performed by five surgeons at one hospital between 1981 and 1984 and compared the results in 35% of the patients who underwent incidental appendectomy with those in the remainder. Factors studied were operative time, postoperative stay, postoperative fever and leukocytosis, the need for intravenous fluids, parenteral analgesia and antibiotics, and infectious complications. Most of these variables differed between individual surgeons, but the addition of incidental appendectomy did not significantly alter any variable for an individual surgeon or for the group as a whole. Incidental appendectomy seems to be a safe practice and one that does not alter the outcome of hysterectomy or cholecystectomy but does protect against subsequent appendicitis.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0008-428X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
31
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
448-51
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-8-16
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1988
pubmed:articleTitle
Is incidental appendectomy a safe practice?
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Surgery, Orillia Soldiers' Memorial Hospital, Ont.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article