Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1985-5-29
pubmed:abstractText
This investigation utilized an accurate photographic method and grading scale for evaluating acne in sixty-two patients. During a randomized double-blind clinical study in which half of the patients received minocycline and half, tetracycline, photographs of facial or body acne were taken at baseline and every 2 weeks over a 12-week period of therapy. In addition to on-site blinded gradings by both the investigator and the patients, separate assessments were made by two independent dermatologists utilizing the scale and the transparencies taken during the study. A reasonable agreement was found between the investigator, the patients, and the independent dermatologists, indicating the usefulness of this method. The investigator's rating of acne severity disclosed a significantly (p less than or equal to 0.05) more rapid clinical response at weeks 2 and 8 in the patients who received minocycline than in those who received tetracycline. Also, the assessment of one of the independent dermatologists showed a significantly (p = 0.024) better response to minocycline than to tetracycline at week 8 of therapy. The incidence of adverse clinical experiences was lower in the minocycline-treated group (10%) than in the tetracycline-treated group (22%).
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0190-9622
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
12
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
461-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1985
pubmed:articleTitle
An accurate photographic method for grading acne: initial use in a double-blind clinical comparison of minocycline and tetracycline.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial