Linked Life Data

3055939

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/3055939

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1988-12-19
pubmed:abstractText
The acceptance of simplified technical procedures that minimize clinical effort is exemplified by the popularity of direct bonding. This study (1) measured the comparative tensile bond strengths of brackets bonded directly in vitro to both glazed and deglazed porcelains by the use of five adhesive systems, and (2) recorded failure sites. System 1+, Enamelite 500, Isopast/Silanit, and Concise/Scotchprime proved to have strengths that should be acceptable clinically. Ultra-bond produced a bond that was significantly less in strength as compared with the other four systems. There was no significant difference in the bond of glazed and deglazed porcelains. Diamond polishing paste was better at restoring the porcelain surface to original smoothness in comparison with polishing stones. Irreversible damage to the porcelain surface may result from the bonding procedure.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
D
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0889-5406
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
94
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
421-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1988
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparative tensile strengths of brackets bonded to porcelain with orthodontic adhesive and porcelain repair systems.
pubmed:affiliation
Indiana University, Indianapolis.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study