Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9
pubmed:dateCreated
1988-9-28
pubmed:abstractText
We conducted a four-period cross-over randomized trial in which we found that patients with chronic airflow limitation demonstrated symptomatic improvement with both inhaled albuterol and oral theophylline. The response, however, was not uniform. We therefore tested the ability of acute change in forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) following inhaled beta agonist to predict long-term symptomatic response to albuterol and theophylline. We found that the reproducibility of acute change in FEV1 over three repetitions was poor (intraclass correlation 0.17). Furthermore, the mean improvement FEV1 following inhaled albuterol across the three repetitions did not relate closely to symptomatic response to either albuterol or theophylline. We conclude that acute response to inhaled beta agonist is not useful for identifying patients with chronic airflow limitation who are likely to benefit from bronchodilator treatment.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0003-9926
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
148
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1949-52
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1988
pubmed:articleTitle
Acute response to bronchodilator. An imperfect guide for bronchodilator therapy in chronic airflow limitation.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't