Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1987-3-17
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The neurographic activity evoked either by stimulation of the tibial nerve at the popliteal fossa or by percussion of the Achilles tendon has been recorded at lumbar and thigh levels, in order to find out whether conduction time, temporal dispersion and central delay of the neural volleys underlying the monosynaptic reflex (H or T) may change as a function of stimulus intensity; under facilitatory or inhibitory experimental conditions; "spontaneously", i.e. during the steady state. The reflexly evoked ventral root discharge (VRD) decreases in latency with increasing stimulus intensity up to the maximum reflex response in the absence of changes in afferent (thigh to spine) or efferent (spine to thigh) conduction times. Reduction of the central delay was greater with mechanical than electrical stimulation, probably due to the combined effect of spatial and temporal summation under the former experimental condition. The latency of the VRD related to the maximal H response was not further modified by supramaximal stimulus strengths. The Jendrassik manoeuvre caused a significant decrease in latency of the VRD, the opposite effect being observed during calf muscle vibration. A significant relationship between amplitude and latency of single VRDs could be demonstrated during the "steady state". Our data point to the existence of a positive correlation between the size of the motoneuronal pool activated by an afferent volley and speed of transmission in the reflex pathway, both during the "steady state" and under either facilitatory or inhibitory experimental conditions, provided that the test stimulus strength does not exceed the maximum reflex response (H or T). No detectable signs of peripheral dispersion of the VRD could be demonstrated, irrespective of the stimulus employed: this suggests that the axon diameters of the motoneurones contributing to the monosynaptic reflex fall within a fairly narrow distribution.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0014-4819
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
64
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
411-20
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-11-11
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:3026829-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:3026829-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:3026829-Electromyography,
pubmed-meshheading:3026829-Evoked Potentials,
pubmed-meshheading:3026829-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:3026829-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:3026829-Motor Neurons,
pubmed-meshheading:3026829-Neural Conduction,
pubmed-meshheading:3026829-Neural Inhibition,
pubmed-meshheading:3026829-Reaction Time,
pubmed-meshheading:3026829-Reflex, Monosynaptic,
pubmed-meshheading:3026829-Spinal Cord,
pubmed-meshheading:3026829-Synapses,
pubmed-meshheading:3026829-Synaptic Transmission
|
pubmed:year |
1986
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Facilitation and inhibition of synaptic transmission in the spinal cord: an electroneurographic study in humans.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|