Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
8
pubmed:dateCreated
1985-4-15
pubmed:abstractText
In a multi-centre double-blind (double-dummy) trial the effectiveness of low-dose antacid gel (6 X 12 ml/d; neutralisation capacity 120 mmol) was compared with that of a standard dose of cimetidine (1 g/d) in the curative treatment of gastric ulcer. Antacid gel was given to 65 patients, cimetidine to 60. Diagnosis was confirmed by endoscopic biopsy, which was also employed in a serial follow-up. After 4 weeks antacid gel and cimetidine produced cures in 43% and 52%, respectively; after 8 weeks 76% and 89%, respectively, the difference between the two methods not being statistically significant. There was also no statistically significant difference with regard to ulcer pain. In one case each in the antacid and cimetidine groups, the treatment had to be stopped because of side effects. Diarrhoea was more common on cimetidine than on antacid gel. It is concluded that both low-dose antacids gels and cimetidine are suitable in the treatment of gastric ulcers.
pubmed:language
ger
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0012-0472
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
22
pubmed:volume
110
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
N
pubmed:pagination
283-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1985
pubmed:articleTitle
[Therapy of stomach ulcer with low-dose antacid gel and cimetidine. A multicenter double-blind study].
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, English Abstract, Controlled Clinical Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't