Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
4
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1989-2-10
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Perceptual matching data show several puzzling effects. Particularly problematic are the disparities between the processing rates for same and different stimuli--the fast-same effect--and between the processing rates for two same-different judgment tasks that are related as mirror images--the task effect. Current models have difficulty accounting simultaneously for both effects. Central to these models is a stimulus comparison process that derives relative judgments of sameness and difference from tests of the congruence of stimulus representations. A contrasting view holds that same-different judgments can be modeled as absolute, rather than relative, judgments. This latter view is shown to be supported by experimental data. Reaction times for judgments of identical letter strings increase with string length at the same rate whether judgments are based on all the information in the strings or just the information in a single pair of component letters. The data show that stimulus comparisons of the sort described by previous models are not involved in these judgments. An attentional model accounts for the data and for the fast-same and task effects as well.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Nov
|
| pubmed:issn |
0096-1523
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
14
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
707-15
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1988
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparison requirements and attention in identical-nonidentical stimulus discriminations.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|