Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1987-3-19
pubmed:abstractText
The in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of A-56268 (TE-031), the 6-O-methyl derivative of erythromycin, was compared with those of erythromycin and other reference drugs. A-56268 had the same spectrum of antibacterial activity as erythromycin. A-56268 was generally 1 log2 dilution more potent or equal to erythromycin against all organisms except haemophilus influenzae and Propionibacterium acnes, for which A-56268 was 1 log2 dilution and 3 log2 dilutions, respectively, less potent. The MBC of A-56268 and erythromycin was not significantly different from the MIC against Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and H. influenzae but was more than 2 log2 dilutions higher than the MICs for some Staphylococcus aureus strains. Human serum at a concentration of 50% did not change the in vitro potency of A-56268 or erythromycin. A-56268 was similar to erythromycin in being more active at pH 8.0 than at the physiologic pH of 7.3. The activity of A-56268 was synergistic with sulfamethoxazole against 4 of 12 strains of H. influenzae. In mouse protection tests, when administered orally A-56268 was more potent than erythromycin against H. influenzae, S. pyogenes, S. pneumoniae, and S. aureus. After subcutaneous administration the potencies of A-56268 and erythromycin were not statistically different from each other. A-56268 was more potent than erythromycin against Legionella infection in guinea pigs. The concentration of A-56268 in the serum and lung was higher than that of erythromycin after intraperitoneal administration. In A-56268 in the serum and lung was higher than that of erythromycin after intraperitoneal administration. In mice, the peak levels in serum of A-56268 and erythromycin were similar after subcutaneous administration and seven times higher for A-56268 after oral administration. The serum half-life of A-56268 was approximately twice that of erythromycin after administration by both routes.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-310164, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-3884913, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-3902764, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-3974301, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-4008390, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-408423, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-408424, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-4370380, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-4597114, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-4991920, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-5774765, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-6333840, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-6706855, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-6732223, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-6812492, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-6830204, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-6982352, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-7042755, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-7447427, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2949695-879736
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0066-4804
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
30
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
865-73
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Administration, Oral, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Animals, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Anti-Bacterial Agents, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Bacteria, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Bacterial Infections, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Clarithromycin, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Drug Combinations, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Drug Synergism, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Erythromycin, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Female, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Guinea Pigs, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Injections, Subcutaneous, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Kinetics, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Legionella, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Legionnaires' Disease, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Male, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Mice, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Microbial Sensitivity Tests, pubmed-meshheading:2949695-Sulfamethoxazole
pubmed:year
1986
pubmed:articleTitle
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of A-56268 (TE-031), a new macrolide.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study