Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
32
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1985-11-22
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
With automated analysers, bacterial identification and susceptibility testing can be performed in 4-5 hours instead of 12-18 hours with conventional methods. A controlled trial was carried out in the surgical ward of a university hospital to evaluate the clinical repercussions of these rapid methods. The automated analyser reduced delays in the laboratory by about 25%, and optimizing information transfer from laboratory to ward brought the reduction up to 50%. It was found that earlier results of susceptibility testing modified prescriptions and this may be expected to result in a more rational use of antibiotics.
|
| pubmed:language |
fre
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Sep
|
| pubmed:issn |
0755-4982
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:day |
28
|
| pubmed:volume |
14
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
1697-700
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1985
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
[Clinical value of rapid bacteriological results in nosocomial infections. Comparison with traditional methods].
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Comparative Study,
English Abstract,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|