Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1989-11-27
pubmed:abstractText
Thirty patients with esophageal varices, portal venous obstruction and a histologically proven normal liver underwent either one of 2 different types of surgery. Shunt surgery was performed on 20 patients: 9 had a mesocaval shunt, 3, a splenorenal shunt, 4, a left gastric venacaval shunt, and 4, a distal splenorenal shunt. Conversely, direct interruption was performed on the other 10 patients; 6 underwent an esophageal transection, and 4 underwent a resection of the proximal stomach. Re-hemorrhage occurred in 7 of the former 20 patients but not in any of the 10 on whom the direct interruption method was used. In 6 of these 7 patients who experienced rebleeding, subsequent direct interruption surgery led to control of the bleeding. One patient died of a variceal hemorrhage one month postoperatively. The total 10 year cumulative survival rate was 86.3 per cent. In the light of these findings, we believe that methods of direct interruption, such as esophageal transection, may well be the approach of choice for patients with esophageal varices caused by extrahepatic portal venous obstruction.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
0047-1909
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
19
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
418-23
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1989
pubmed:articleTitle
Esophageal transection may well be the approach of choice for patient with portal venous obstruction and esophageal varices.
pubmed:affiliation
Second Department of surgery, Kyushu University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article