Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1978-12-27
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The inaccuracy of the calibration of two Merritt-B probes, old and new style, was investigated. It appeared that the calibration of the Merritt-B "new style" probe was better than the calibration of the old one. The influence of the mode of calibration and the reading of the calibration on pocket depth assessment with a Merritt-B "old style" probe was studied in an in vitro model. The model consisted of 32 aluminium cubes each with a hole in the centre. The holes were 1 mm in cross-section and the depth varied from 0.25 mm to 8 mm in 0.25-mm increments. Results show that pocket depths of 1 mm to 8 mm +/- 0.25 mm generally were read correctly about 90% of the time. This was not true for the 4- and 6-mm areas. When a probe was used where the 4- and 6-mm marks were omitted, pocket depth in that area were read correctly only in about 60% of instances. This difference disappeared when the 4- and 6-mm marks were added. Results of measuring the half millimeter values showed that generally 80% were recorded as the lower whole millimeter.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
D
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Aug
|
pubmed:issn |
0303-6979
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
5
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
182-7
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:279546-Dental Instruments,
pubmed-meshheading:279546-Diagnostic Errors,
pubmed-meshheading:279546-Evaluation Studies as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:279546-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:279546-Periodontal Pocket,
pubmed-meshheading:279546-Periodontics,
pubmed-meshheading:279546-Periodontitis,
pubmed-meshheading:279546-Research Design
|
pubmed:year |
1978
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Errors in the assessment of pocket depth in vitro.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|