|
pubmed:abstractText |
Patients with ovarian cancer often respond well to combination chemotherapy initially but the majority eventually relapse when, with further treatment, the initially successful regimen proves ineffectual. The cause of such failures frequently has been attributed to the development of drug resistance. Although the mechanisms of acquired resistance in situ are still poorly understood, studies in vitro have shown that cells selected for resistance to one drug often exhibit cross-resistance to other seemingly unrelated agents, suggesting a somewhat generalised mechanism of resistance. We have studied the role of glutathione (GSH) and drug transport in determining the sensitivity to adriamycin (ADR) of a panel of human ovarian cell lines established directly from biopsies of patients with diverse treatment histories. These cell lines exhibited inherent differences in sensitivity to ADR by a dose factor of up to 3; a difference that was considerably less than what has been reported when cells were selected for drug resistance in vitro. The differences in drug sensitivity reported here among the various cell lines appeared to be unrelated to drug transport, in terms of both influx and efflux. Moreover, although these cell lines have a wide range of GSH content, there was only a poor correlation between drug sensitivity and cellular GSH content per se. However, when exposed to a clinically relevant dose of ADR, the GSH content of cell lines that were 'sensitive' decreased, whereas that of cell lines that were 'resistant' increased. To take these time-dependent changes in GSH into consideration, the area under the GSH content versus time curve (AUC), with and without ADR treatment, was calculated for each cell line. When this latter factor was included in the analysis, greatly improved correlations were found between GSH kinetic parameters and responses to ADR. In particular, ADR resistance was found to be closely correlated with the positive changes in absolute GSH AUC following ADR treatment (r = 0.92; P less than 0.01). Using 35S-labelled cysteine and methionine as tracers, it was found that the essential difference between the 'resistant' and 'sensitive' lines was that the 'resistant' lines had higher steady-state rates of GSH synthesis than the 'sensitive' lines. These results demonstrate that changes in cellular GSH concentration during treatment may be an important indicator of tumour cell response to ADR.
|
