Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
7
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1989-9-29
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
The amount of ventilation relative to perfusion (the ventilation-perfusion ratio) received by the lung is a useful indicator of the efficiency of lung function. Two alternative techniques for recovering the ventilation-perfusion ratio are outlined. While both techniques rely on the use of inert gases, one is well established and the other is only in a developmental stage. This paper focuses on a comparison of the amount of statistical information provided by these two techniques about the ventilation-perfusion ratio. The criterion applied here for measuring amount of information has roots in communication theory and uses ideas inherent to Bayesian inference.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Jul
|
| pubmed:issn |
0277-6715
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
8
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
861-70
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1989
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparison of the information in two lung function experiments.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Applied Statistics, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Berkshire, U.K.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|