Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
7
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1989-9-8
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Design of control charts for the mean, the within-run component of variance, and the ratio of between-run to within-run components of variance is outlined. The between-run component of variation is the main source of imprecision for analytes determined by an enzymo- or radioimmunoassay principle; accordingly, explicit control of this component is especially relevant for these types of analytes. Power curves for typical situations are presented. I also show that a between-run component of variation puts an upper limit on the achievable power towards systematic errors. Therefore, when the between-run component of variation exceeds the within-run component, use of no more than about four controls per run is reasonable at a given concentration.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Jul
|
| pubmed:issn |
0009-9147
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
35
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
1416-22
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2000-12-18
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1989
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
The between-run component of variation in internal quality control.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|