Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1989-6-13
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Infrared photocoagulation therapy was used on a total of 302 patients. Approximately 20% of the patients experienced minor bleeding; however, two required surgery, and 30% of the patients experienced discomfort during a 14-day period following the procedure. Good results were obtained in patients with first- and second-degree hemorrhoids. Heater probe coagulation therapy was conducted in a total of 264 patients. Good results were achieved in 90% of patients with first- and second-degree hemorrhoids, minor pain and bleeding occurred in approximately 10% of these patients, and one patient with third-degree hemorrhoids who was treated with this technique failed to respond and required surgery. Ultroid d.c. current therapy was utilized in 192 patients, and follow-up results were good in 95% of these cases. Minor bleeding occurred in four patients. It is concluded that all three techniques, performed on an outpatient basis with little or no sedation, are effective modalities for first- and second-degree hemorrhoids, but that Ultroid d.c. current therapy is associated with less discomfort and fewer complications and that Ultroid therapy may yield good results in some patients with third- or even fourth-degree hemorrhoids.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
May
|
pubmed:issn |
0002-9270
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
84
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
488-92
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
1989
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
A personal experience in comparing three nonoperative techniques for treating internal hemorrhoids.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Gastrointestinal Laboratories, Brea Community Hospital, California.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|