Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:dateCreated
1990-1-25
pubmed:abstractText
The effectiveness and tolerability of tenoxicam and piroxicam, administered as a once-daily 20 mg suppository, were assessed in a comparative, randomised, double-blind trial in 48 subjects suffering from acute non-articular rheumatism. Both spontaneous and induced pain improved significantly with each of the treatments. There was no significant difference between the two treatments, whatever criterion of effectiveness was considered, i.e. spontaneous pain, induced pain or overall judgement. The incidence of undesirable side-effects was comparable for both treatments. Thirteen per cent of patients in the tenoxicam group and 16% of the patients in the piroxicam group experienced at least one undesirable side-effect. The majority of reported side-effects were of a digestive nature; however none of these were serious. The risk/benefit ratio of tenoxicam was found to be identical to that of piroxicam in the treatment of acute non-articular rheumatism.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0301-3847
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
80
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
62-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1989
pubmed:articleTitle
Double-blind study of tenoxicam suppositories versus piroxicam suppositories in acute non-articular rheumatism.
pubmed:affiliation
CHRU Limoges, Frante.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial