Linked Life Data

2652860

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/2652860

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1989-5-26
pubmed:abstractText
Modern tissue transfer techniques have drastically modified our approach to reconstructive surgery in general. Certainly, the management of traumatic genital amputation is no exception. Although the unique vascular properties of the penis have allowed for astonishingly good results in a number of cases of genital amputation injuries, it is certain that microreplantation procedures make for uniformly good results with a minimum of postoperative complications. After microreplantation, the patient is left with a penis that is cosmetically normal and functionally nearly normal or undetectably abnormal. Although microreplantation offers the best results, certainly in the case of penile amputation, if microreplantation technology is not available, the older corporal reattachment techniques should be offered.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
May
pubmed:issn
0094-0143
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
16
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
359-67
pubmed:dateRevised
2005-11-16
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1989
pubmed:articleTitle
Management of amputation injuries of the male genitalia.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Urology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review, Historical Article