Linked Life Data

2634734

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/2634734

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
10
pubmed:dateCreated
1990-6-5
pubmed:abstractText
Fifty-six dogs were used for the comparison of the allogenous and autogenous bone graft in anterior interbody and posterior spinal fusion. Excluding 7 cases with wound infections, the end results of the allograft and autograft in anterior interbody and posterior spinal fusion were nearly the same, provided that the rules of technique for the spinal fusion were strictly followed, especially in the allograft group. Grossly, there was a reduction tendency in the fusion mass of the allograft group that was proven by roentgenographic examination of the harvested spinal block. Histologically, there was no evidence of regeneration of the allograft that can be readily detected in the autograft. In the allograft group, osteogenesis can only be seen in the recipient sites, the allograft transplants become sequestrated and resorbed.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0371-7682
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
88
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
989-94
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1989
pubmed:articleTitle
Experimental allograft in spinal fusion in dogs.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't