Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2621037rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0080103lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2621037lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2587213lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2621037lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007328lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2621037lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0036577lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:dateCreated1990-3-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:abstractTextInvestigators have suggested using relatives of cases as the control group when studying complex diseases thought to have a major genetic component. However, there is a concern about possible bias and we developed a model to examine the possibility of bias in the selection of relatives as the control group. Assuming the exposure-specific risks of disease remain constant over time, the results indicate that even when there is a correlation in the exposure status among relatives, selection of controls from relatives of cases does not, of itself, introduce bias in the estimate of effect.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:issn0300-5771lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GoldsteinA...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HodgeS ESElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HaginR ARAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:volume18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:pagination985-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2621037-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2621037-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2621037-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2621037-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2621037-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2621037-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2621037-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2621037-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:year1989lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:articleTitleSelection bias in case-control studies using relatives as the controls.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:affiliationDivision of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health 90024.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2621037pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2621037lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2621037lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2621037lld:pubmed