Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1990-2-22
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Public residential facilities were surveyed regarding the roles played by their Human Rights Committees in the review of restrictive/aversive behavior modification procedures. Almost 98% of the responding facilities reported that they had an active Human Rights Committee, with the largest plurality of members being staff members from the facility. Review of restrictive/aversive procedures was a role for over 95% of the committees, even though most committees appeared to lack great degrees of expertise in the clinical use of behavior modification. Other areas of review were discussed.
|
pubmed:keyword | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
E
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
pubmed:issn |
0047-6765
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
27
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
375-82
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2011-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:2607972-Behavior Therapy,
pubmed-meshheading:2607972-Human Rights,
pubmed-meshheading:2607972-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:2607972-Intellectual Disability,
pubmed-meshheading:2607972-Professional Staff Committees,
pubmed-meshheading:2607972-Residential Facilities,
pubmed-meshheading:2607972-United States
|
pubmed:year |
1989
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Role of Human Rights Committees in the review of restrictive/aversive behavior modification procedures: a national survey.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|