Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1989-5-11
pubmed:abstractText
This study was designed to examine the reproducibility and the learning effects of incremental maximal cycle ergometer testing in patients with obstructive lung diseases who are untrained and have never done such a test before. Eleven patients were studied on 2 consecutive days with an interval of 24 h. The reproducibility (expressed in relative duplicate error) of most of the parameters tested was good: workload (watt) 4.5%, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max 3.5%, gas exchange ratio (R) 3.4%, and heart rate 3.7%. Moderate reproducibility was found in maximal ventilation (VEmax) 6.6%, carbon dioxide production (VCO2max 6.0%, and respiration frequency (RF) 8.3%. The reproducibility of the time between the start of the test and the minimum value of VE/VO2 and VE/VCO2 was low. We concluded that in these patients the results of incremental cycle ergometer testing showed good reproducibility in a test-retest procedure. There were no learning effects.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0341-2040
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
167
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
129-33
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-21
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1989
pubmed:articleTitle
Reproducibility of incremental maximal cycle ergometer tests in patients with mild to moderate obstructive lung diseases.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Nymegen, The Netherlands.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article