Linked Life Data

2493798

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/2493798

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1989-4-25
pubmed:abstractText
It has been suggested that Humphrey's ADE system may be an improvement on the Bain system. To compare their efficiencies we have studied 20 anesthetized adults who had controlled ventilation established with a circle absorber system at a VE sufficient to maintain normocapnia. Patients were then randomly allocated to either a Bain or an ADE system. Fresh gas flow was sufficient to keep PE'CO2 constant for 30 min. The other circuit was then used for an additional 30 min. The required FGF was 54 ml kg-1 min-1 for the Bain system, compared with 67 ml kg-1 min-1 for the ADE system. We conclude that, during controlled ventilation, the ADE system is 25% less efficient than the Bain system.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0007-0912
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
62
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
150-2
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1989
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of the Bain and the ADE systems during controlled ventilation in adults.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial