Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
7
pubmed:dateCreated
1990-10-9
pubmed:abstractText
The porosity and the mechanical strength of 64 bone cement specimens were investigated. Different types of mixing procedures were tested: 1) hand, 2) compression, 3) vacuum and 4) the combination of vacuum stirring and compression. The differences in porosity and mechanical stability are remarkable. In relation to hand-mixed bone cement all techniques are leading to a reduction in the number of cavities. Specimens made by compression are showing a confluence of several small cavities to a few large. There is only a change in the distribution of the embedded gas volume, but not a reduction. The lowest porosity is seen in vacuum mixed specimens.
pubmed:language
ger
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
0009-4722
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
61
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
512-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1990
pubmed:articleTitle
[A quantitative analysis for determining porosity of pre-compressed and vacuum-mixed bone cement].
pubmed:affiliation
Abteilung Osteopathologie, Universität Hamburg.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract