Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1990-7-19
pubmed:abstractText
The aim of the study was to evaluate the entire spectrum of mediastinoscopy, from common to rare conditions, in relation to clinical judgement. The 2021 consecutive patients comprised 992 with 'open' clinical diagnoses at mediastinoscopy and 1,029 with verified or presumptive diagnoses. In the first group the most common indications for mediastinoscopy were pulmonary infiltrate (73%) and mediastinal shadow (17%), and in the second group they were bronchogenic carcinoma (57%) and sarcoidosis (38%). Mediastinoscopy was classified as positive in 43% of the first, and 60% of the second group. Of the total series, 51% had positive mediastinoscopy findings, the most common being malignant disease (24%) and sarcoidosis (21%). Mediastinoscopy was useful especially for evaluating malignant mediastinal involvement, but also for differentiation of lymphadenopathies and in diagnosis of rare diseases.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0036-5580
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
24
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
43-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1990
pubmed:articleTitle
Mediastinoscopy in relation to clinical evaluation.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Otolaryngology, University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article