Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2332578rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0000769lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:dateCreated1990-6-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:abstractTextTwo recent court cases, Cruzan v Harmon and In the Matter of O'Connor, denied family requests to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. The facts of the cases are discussed, as well as the impact on medical practice for physicians in Missouri and New York. Approaches of other state courts are pointed out. While critical of the judicial reasoning in both cases, the article provides guidance to doctors about how to work within the court decisions and still honor patient wishes.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:keywordhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:keywordhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:keywordhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:keywordhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:citationSubsetElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:issn0002-8614lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GasnerM RMRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:volume38lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:pagination594-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:dateRevised2008-3-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2332578-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2332578-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2332578-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2332578-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2332578-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2332578-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2332578-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2332578-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2332578-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2332578-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2332578-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2332578-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2332578-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:articleTitleCruzan v Harmon, and In the Matter of O'Connor. Two anomalies.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:affiliationSociety for the Right to Die, Inc, New York, NY.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2332578pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2332578lld:pubmed