Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1990-6-5
pubmed:abstractText
Two recent court cases, Cruzan v Harmon and In the Matter of O'Connor, denied family requests to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. The facts of the cases are discussed, as well as the impact on medical practice for physicians in Missouri and New York. Approaches of other state courts are pointed out. While critical of the judicial reasoning in both cases, the article provides guidance to doctors about how to work within the court decisions and still honor patient wishes.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:keyword
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
E
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
May
pubmed:issn
0002-8614
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
38
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
594-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-3-10
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1990
pubmed:articleTitle
Cruzan v Harmon, and In the Matter of O'Connor. Two anomalies.
pubmed:affiliation
Society for the Right to Die, Inc, New York, NY.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article