Linked Life Data

232765

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/232765

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1980-8-15
pubmed:abstractText
In a prospective study, bone age (BA) from both hand and elbow was assessed in 390 children, aged 6-15 years, in order to determine: (a) whether or not BA assessment from the hand and from the elbow give comparable results, and (b) whether the accuracy of predicting skeletal age from the hand may be improved by the additional BA determination in the elbow. BA assessment in the hand was performed according to the method of Greulich and Pyle while the standards of Schinz and Baensch were used for the elbow. Statistical analysis of data was carried out according to age groups as well as according to groups of clinical diagnoses. With only one exception in the group of so-called "healthy individuals", there was no difference between "hand age" and "elbow age". Thus, except in a very small group of subjects, both methods of BA assessment were found to be equivalent in predicting skeletal age in children between 6-15 years. Equivocal results were obtained regarding the question of whether the accuracy of BA assessment in the hand may be improved by the simultaneous BA determination from the elbow. Until further studies on larger statistical material provide more conclusive information in this matter, we feel that the combined determination of BA in the hand and elbow is not warranted for clinical purposes.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0034-9704
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
4
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
11-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1979
pubmed:articleTitle
The determination of bone age in the elbow as compared to the hand. A study in 390 children.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article