Linked Life Data

2289876

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/2289876

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-4-3
pubmed:abstractText
Twenty patients underwent hip re-arthroplasty following resection arthroplasty due to former prosthetic infection, aseptic loosening, or TBC coxitis. In 9 cases Gentamycin-loaded cement was used. In 11 the re-arthroplasty was cementless. The overall results, evaluated by the Mayo and Harris scoring systems, were moderately good. Seventy-five per cent of patients reported relief from pain and improved hip function. However, in the previously infected cases significantly better results were found in the cementless group, while major complications such as deep infection, luxation, or loosening of the implant were mainly concentrated in the cementless re-arthroplasties following aseptic loosening and cemented re-arthroplasties following septic as well as aseptic failures.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0390-5489
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
16
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
159-67
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1990
pubmed:articleTitle
A comparison between cemented and cementless implants in revision arthroplasty of the hip following resection arthroplasty.
pubmed:affiliation
Orthopaedic Hospital of the Invalid Foundation, Helsinki, Finland.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article