rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
12
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1991-3-4
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The epidural space was located in 32 obstetric patients using loss of resistance to air, while in a further 35 saline was used. The incidence of paraesthesia was 56% in the air group and 57% in the saline group. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of other complications or in the quality of analgesia provided.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
pubmed:chemical |
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
pubmed:issn |
0003-2409
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
45
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
1077-9
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:2278336-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:2278336-Air,
pubmed-meshheading:2278336-Anesthesia, Epidural,
pubmed-meshheading:2278336-Anesthesia, Obstetrical,
pubmed-meshheading:2278336-Catheterization, Peripheral,
pubmed-meshheading:2278336-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:2278336-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:2278336-Paresthesia,
pubmed-meshheading:2278336-Pregnancy,
pubmed-meshheading:2278336-Sodium Chloride
|
pubmed:year |
1990
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Paraesthesia with lumbar epidural catheters. A comparison of air and saline in a loss-of-resistance technique.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
East Birmingham Hospital, Bordesley Green East.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|