Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
11
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1991-3-5
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Clinical decision science is concerned with rational clinical decisions. All branches of medical research contribute here, but controlled clinical trials of the pragmatic variety carry a particular responsibility. Usually, however, they are not conducted and reported so that they can be used directly as input to a decision analysis. We suggest that the forces of the two methodologies should be united, and point out some areas where this 'marriage' will have a non-trivial impact: choice of end points, style of outcome recording, adaptive designs, and style of result presentation. Special attention is given to the decision-analytic setting of research priorities, the role of utility calculus in quantifying the ethical dilemmas that surround clinical trials, and the use of patient attitude towards outcomes of treatment as a covariate in its own right.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Nov
|
| pubmed:issn |
0277-6715
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
9
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
1243-57
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1990
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
The marriage of clinical trials and clinical decision science.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Institute of Medical Genetics (Biostatistics), University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review
|