Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
44
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1990-12-12
|
pubmed:abstractText |
On the basis of the endoscopic appearance, 71 rectal polyps were assessed as adenomata or non-neoplastic polyps, after which the endoscopic diagnosis was compared with the results of histological examination. The diagnosis based on macroscopic examination of the polyps proved correct in only 62% of the cases. It is concluded that the diagnosis of adenoma cannot be established solely on the proctoscopic appearance of a polyp and, as adenomata are premalignant, removal of all polyps found at proctoscopy is recommended.
|
pubmed:language |
dan
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Oct
|
pubmed:issn |
0041-5782
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
29
|
pubmed:volume |
152
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
3254-5
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:2238213-Adenoma,
pubmed-meshheading:2238213-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:2238213-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:2238213-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:2238213-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:2238213-Intestinal Polyps,
pubmed-meshheading:2238213-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:2238213-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:2238213-Proctoscopy,
pubmed-meshheading:2238213-Rectal Neoplasms
|
pubmed:year |
1990
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
[Proctoscopic versus histologic diagnosis of rectal polyps].
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Rigshospitalet, kirurgisk gastroenterologisk afdeling C, København.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
English Abstract
|