Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2214034rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0042449lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2214034lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205108lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2214034lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0733511lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2214034lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1555029lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2214034lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0741847lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2214034lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2214034lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441633lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2214034lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1527362lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2214034lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205547lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:dateCreated1990-11-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:abstractTextTo assess the utility of routine duplex surveillance, 379 infrainguinal reversed vein grafts performed at two independent teaching hospitals were prospectively entered into a surveillance protocol from March 1986 through August 1989. An average of 3.2 postoperative duplex graft flow velocity (GFV) measurements per graft was obtained during a mean follow-up interval of 21 1/2 months. Only 2.1% of 280 grafts with GFV measurements greater than 45 cm/sec failed within 6 months of a normal surveillance examination. GFV measurements less than 45 cm/sec in 99 grafts led to arteriography in 75 grafts, identifying 50 stenotic lesions in 48 bypasses (12.6% of series). Inflow lesions were present in 5%, outflow stenoses in 2%, and intrinsic graft stenoses in only 6% of bypasses. Only 29% of grafts identified as failing by duplex scan were associated with a reduction in ankle-brachial index of greater than 0.15. Secondary reconstructions were performed in 48 grafts based on detection of a reduced GFV measurement; all such reconstructions are patent after a mean follow-up of 5 months. Duplex surveillance is more reliable in identification of failing vein grafts than is determination of ankle-brachial index.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:issn0741-5214lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HarrisE JEJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PorterJ MJMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MillsJ LJLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TaylorL MLMJrlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BeckettW CWClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:volume12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:pagination379-86; discussion 387-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2214034-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2214034-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2214034-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2214034-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2214034-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2214034-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2214034-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2214034-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2214034-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2214034-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2214034-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2214034-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2214034-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:articleTitleThe importance of routine surveillance of distal bypass grafts with duplex scanning: a study of 379 reversed vein grafts.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:affiliationVascular Surgery Service, Wilford Hall USAF Medical Center/SGHSG, Lackland AFB, TX 78236-5300.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2214034pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2214034lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2214034lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2214034lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2214034lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2214034lld:pubmed